Topic: Copyright

Subscribe to Copyright RSS feed

Agence France Presse v. Morel – THIRD UPDATE

By on Posted in Copyright, Litigation
We have posted previously on Agence France Presse v. Morel, the initial opinion of which was issued January 2013, as well as several updates in the case since then. The case so far Briefly summarizing the case so far, photographer Daniel Morel posted some photographs on Twitter.  Agence France Presse (“AFP”) copied eight of those … Continue reading

A picture can be worth a thousand links

Daniel Daniele (CA)By Daniel Daniele (CA) on Posted in Copyright, Employment and labor, Privacy, Social media policies
From giant billboards on the highway to tiny pictures that can go viral within seconds, the use of social media sites like Instagram, Pinterest and Tumblr has revolutionized the advertising industry. Companies can now reach their target audiences more quickly and more effectively by taking advantage of instantaneous posting of pictures and blogs. The use … Continue reading

Memes and GIFs: a new cultural phenomenon

Daniel Daniele (CA)By Daniel Daniele (CA) on Posted in Copyright
From “Winter is Coming” to plays on the Harlem Shake to anything involving cats, memes and GIFs (short for Graphics Interchange Format) are an increasingly popular way in which cultural ideas are shared. A meme has been characterized as a “categorization of a cultural trend or truth, a unit for communicating and collectively sharing cultural … Continue reading

Employees and DMCA “Safe Harbor”

Susan Ross (US)By Susan Ross (US) on Posted in Copyright
Any employer with a web site or social media page that invites users to provide content will probably be interested in a September 18, 2013 case from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York involving Capitol Records and video-sharing site Vimeo. Capitol Records, LLC v. Vimeo LLC, No. 09 Civ. 10101 (RA) … Continue reading

Agence France Presse v. Morel – UPDATE

By on Posted in Copyright
Earlier this year, we wrote about a court opinion relating to photos posted on Twitter, in Agence France Presse v. Morel, the opinion of which was issued in January. The case, it appears, has come back to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, this time to determine the precise … Continue reading

Copyright Safe Harbor for Third-Party Content

Seth Jaffe (US)By Seth Jaffe (US) on Posted in Copyright
Title II of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) provides a safe harbor for online service providers that allow users to self-post content. For companies with Web 2.0 enabled sites, 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) limits liability “for infringement of copyright by reason of the storage at the direction of a user.”  But this safe harbor … Continue reading

YouTube Class Action

Susan Ross (US)By Susan Ross (US) on Posted in Copyright, Litigation
On May 15, 2013, a federal district court denied the plaintiffs’ motion for class action certification in a case involving YouTube. The Football Ass’n Premier League Ltd et al v. YouTube Inc., No. 1:07-cv-03582 (S.D.N.Y. May 15, 2013). We had previously covered the case involving Viacom’s lawsuit against YouTube, where the same district court ruled, on … Continue reading

Viacom v. YouTube

Susan Ross (US)By Susan Ross (US) on Posted in Copyright
On April 18, 2013, a federal district court judge again granted summary judgment in favor of YouTube in a copyright infringement lawsuit originally filed by Viacom, Paramount Pictures, and others in 2007. Viacom Int’l Inc. v. YouTube, Inc., No 1:07-cv-02103-LLS (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 18, 2013). The plaintiffs had claimed that YouTube had infringed their copyrighted movies, television … Continue reading

Twitter Amends DMCA Policy Due to Copyright Complaints

By on Posted in Copyright
In an “effort to be as transparent as possible regarding the removal or restriction of access to user posted content,” social media company Twitter recently announced changes to the site’s Copyright and Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”) policy. Instead of merely removing the potentially infringing tweets without explanation, Twitter will now clearly mark Tweets and … Continue reading
LexBlog